Home / Episodes / Episode 948

Episode 948: Brendan Schaub & Eddie Bravo

flat earth moon landing conspiracy conspiracy theories

Episode 948: Brendan Schaub & Eddie Bravo

TL;DR: Joe Rogan handed Eddie Bravo roughly an hour of airtime to evangelize flat-earth and faked-moon-landing conspiracies to millions of listeners, turning a fringe belief into a viral cultural touchstone.

This episode is best known for an extended argument in which 10th Planet Jiu-Jitsu founder Eddie Bravo lays out his belief that the Earth is flat and that NASA faked all six Apollo moon landings. While Rogan and Brendan Schaub push back, the segment became one of the most-clipped flat-earth promotional reels on the internet.


The Core Problem: Platforming, Not Debating

Rogan and Schaub did argue back. Rogan invoked peer-reviewed science, sniper ballistics that account for Earth’s curvature, and basic astronomy. That pushback is real and worth crediting.

But platforming a charismatic friend for an hour to repeatedly say “have you looked into it?” and “they faked 6 moon landings” to a multi-million-listener audience is itself the harm. The clip became a recruitment tool circulated by flat-earth communities for years.


The Claims Made on Air

  • Claim: The Earth is flat.
  • Claim: NASA faked all six Apollo moon landings.
  • Claim: No “real” photographs of Earth from space exist.
  • Claim: Mainstream scientific consensus is essentially equivalent to “stuff on the internet.”

What the Evidence Says

  • NASA / Apollo Program: The six crewed Moon landings (1969-1972) returned 842 pounds of lunar samples that have been independently analyzed by labs worldwide, including Soviet labs during the Cold War. NASA Lunar Sample Lab
  • Retroreflectors on the Moon: Apollo 11, 14, and 15 left laser retroreflectors that astronomers (including amateurs) still bounce lasers off today. APOLLO Lunar Laser Ranging
  • Independent imagery: Japan’s SELENE (Kaguya), India’s Chandrayaan, China’s Chang’e, and NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter have all photographed Apollo landing sites. LRO Apollo Site Imagery (NASA)
  • Shape of Earth: Confirmed by satellite geodesy, GPS, intercontinental flight paths, lunar eclipse shadows, ship-disappearance-over-horizon, and direct photography from thousands of independent satellites and astronauts of many nationalities. NOAA on Earth’s Shape
  • Flat Earth physics is internally inconsistent: It cannot explain time zones, the southern hemisphere’s star rotation, circumnavigation routes, or gravity. Scientific American: Flat-Earth Debunk

Joe Rogan’s Role

Credit where due:

  • Rogan does push back, citing peer-reviewed science and ballistics.
  • He repeatedly tells Bravo the flat-earth claim is wrong.

Where Rogan fails:

  • He gives a flat-earther roughly an hour of uninterrupted runway on the largest podcast in the world.
  • He treats the discussion as a fun debate between friends rather than a public-health-of-information problem.
  • He does not bring on an astronomer or physicist to follow up, even as the clip went viral.
  • He frames Bravo’s beliefs as endearing eccentricity (“Eddie’s gone off the deep end”) rather than as misinformation worth correcting on subsequent episodes.

The “have you looked into it?” rhetorical move that Bravo deploys here is the same epistemic pattern that drives anti-vaccine, QAnon, and “do your own research” misinformation more broadly. Letting it run unchallenged for an hour, on a show with this reach, lends it social legitimacy.


Real-World Harm

  • Surveys conducted after the rise of YouTube flat-earth content show measurable increases in belief: a 2018 YouGov poll found only 66% of US millennials were firmly confident the Earth is round. YouGov (2018)
  • Researchers studying flat-earth communities consistently cite YouTube videos and podcast clips as the primary recruitment vector. Asheley Landrum, Texas Tech, presented at AAAS 2019
  • Clips from JRE #948 specifically circulate within flat-earth Facebook groups and YouTube channels as “even Joe Rogan’s friend knows.”

Why It Matters

Platforming nonsense to millions does damage even when the host disagrees. The audience hears the claim repeated for an hour; the rebuttals are often edited out when the clip is reshared.


Sources