Episode 1582: Alex Berenson
The Pandemic’s Wrongest Man Gets Three Hours of Unchallenged Airtime
TL;DR: Joe Rogan platforms former NYT reporter Alex Berenson — a novelist with no scientific credentials — to promote his self-published booklets claiming COVID-19 deaths are overcounted, lockdowns don’t work, and masks are ineffective, all during the deadliest month of the pandemic.
This episode aired on December 23, 2020, as the United States was entering its deadliest phase of the pandemic. Daily deaths were surging past 3,000, hospitals were overwhelmed, and vaccines had only just received emergency authorization. Into this crisis, Rogan invited Berenson to promote “Unreported Truths about COVID-19 and Lockdowns,” a series of self-published booklets that systematically downplayed the pandemic’s severity.
Who Is Alex Berenson?
Berenson graduated from Yale in 1994 with degrees in history and economics. He worked as a business reporter at the New York Times from 1999 to 2010, covering pharmaceuticals and health care industries before leaving to write spy novels full-time.
- He is not a scientist, physician, epidemiologist, or virologist.
- He has no formal training in public health, infectious disease, or biostatistics.
- His primary credential is being a former journalist and award-winning fiction writer.
- The Atlantic would later dub him “The Pandemic’s Wrongest Man” — “dangerously, unflaggingly, and superlatively wrong.”
Claim 1: COVID-19 Deaths Are Being Overcounted
Berenson argued that governments were inflating COVID-19 death counts by including people who died “with” COVID rather than “from” COVID, suggesting the true toll was far lower than reported.
What the evidence says:
-
CDC methodology (2020): The CDC’s guidance required COVID-19 to be listed as a cause of death when it “caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.” This is standard practice for respiratory diseases and is consistent with how influenza deaths have been counted for decades. CDC Death Reporting Guidance
-
Excess mortality data: Studies of excess deaths — the number of deaths above the historical average — consistently showed that official COVID-19 counts likely undercounted the true toll. A study in JAMA found excess deaths exceeded reported COVID-19 deaths by 36% in some periods. JAMA, October 2020
-
Final U.S. death toll: Berenson predicted the U.S. would not reach 500,000 COVID deaths. The actual toll surpassed 1.1 million, more than double what he dismissed as impossible.
Claim 2: Lockdowns Don’t Work
Berenson promoted the view that lockdowns were an overreaction that caused more harm than they prevented, arguing the evidence for their effectiveness was weak.
What the evidence says:
-
Nature study (June 2020): A study published in Nature estimated that lockdown measures across 11 European countries prevented approximately 3.1 million deaths by early May 2020. Nature, June 2020
-
The Lancet (August 2020): Research published in The Lancet found that government interventions including lockdowns significantly reduced COVID-19 transmission rates. The Lancet
-
Nuance Berenson ignores: Reasonable people can debate the tradeoffs of lockdowns (economic harm, mental health impacts, educational disruption). But Berenson did not engage in nuanced cost-benefit analysis. He dismissed their public health value entirely, during a period when hospitals were at capacity and no vaccines were widely available.
Claim 3: Masks Are Ineffective
Berenson argued that “the proof that masks do any good is far weaker than almost anyone understands,” essentially dismissing mask mandates as pandemic theater.
What the evidence says:
-
PNAS review (January 2021): A comprehensive review found that face masks significantly reduce the transmission of respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. PNAS
-
Bangladesh RCT (2021): The largest randomized controlled trial on community masking, conducted in Bangladesh with 340,000 participants, found that surgical masks reduced symptomatic COVID-19 infections by approximately 11%. Science, December 2021
-
CDC guidance (2020): By December 2020, the scientific consensus supported mask-wearing as one layer of protection. While debates continued about the degree of effectiveness of different mask types, Berenson’s blanket dismissal went far beyond reasonable skepticism.
Claim 4: COVID Measures Are an Overreaction
Berenson characterized the pandemic response as hysterical overreaction, dismissing the severity of COVID-19 itself.
What the evidence says:
-
COVID-19 severity: By December 2020, COVID-19 had already killed over 330,000 Americans. It would go on to kill over 1.1 million — making it the deadliest pandemic in U.S. history since 1918.
-
Hospital capacity: During the month this episode aired, ICUs across the country were at or above capacity. Los Angeles County told ambulance crews to stop transporting patients with little chance of survival due to overwhelmed hospitals.
-
Failed predictions: Berenson’s consistent downplaying of the pandemic’s severity was proven catastrophically wrong. His prediction that the U.S. would not reach 500,000 deaths was surpassed within three months of this episode airing.
Joe Rogan’s Role
Rogan’s handling of this episode is a case study in how platforming misinformation works.
-
No pushback on credentials: Rogan introduced Berenson as a former New York Times reporter without questioning whether a novelist and former business journalist was qualified to challenge the global scientific consensus on pandemic response.
-
Amplification without challenge: Rogan allowed Berenson to present his contrarian claims as courageous truth-telling, rarely if ever challenging specific assertions with evidence or expert opinion.
-
False balance framing: By treating Berenson’s views as a legitimate counterweight to public health guidance, the episode created the impression that there was meaningful scientific debate about the severity of COVID-19 — there was not among qualified experts.
-
Massive reach, minimal responsibility: With millions of listeners, Rogan gave Berenson a platform orders of magnitude larger than any he could access on his own. This was Berenson’s first of multiple JRE appearances, and each appearance further elevated his profile as a pandemic contrarian.
Real-World Harm
The consequences of COVID-19 misinformation during this period were measurable and deadly.
-
Vaccine hesitancy: Berenson would go on to become one of the most prominent voices against COVID-19 vaccination. His early appearances on platforms like JRE built the audience and credibility that amplified his later anti-vaccine messaging.
-
Twitter suspension: On August 28, 2021, Twitter permanently suspended Berenson for repeated violations of its COVID-19 misinformation policy. A White House adviser had identified him as “the epicenter of disinfo that radiated outwards to the persuadable public.” Newsweek
-
Undermining public health measures: During the deadliest month of the pandemic, this episode told millions of listeners that COVID deaths were overcounted, lockdowns were useless, and masks did not work. Each of these claims, if acted upon, increased the risk of transmission and death.
-
Downstream influence: Berenson’s JRE appearances helped establish him as a go-to contrarian voice, leading to further appearances on Fox News, Tucker Carlson’s show, and right-wing media, amplifying misinformation to audiences far beyond Rogan’s podcast.
Sources
- The Atlantic: “The Pandemic’s Wrongest Man” (April 2021)
- Wikipedia: Alex Berenson
- FactCheck.org: Alex Berenson Archives
- Science Feedback: Alex Berenson Reviews
- PolitiFact: Alex Berenson Misrepresents Data on Death Rates
- Newsweek: Pandemic’s Wrongest Man Suspended from Twitter
- The Daily Beast: COVID Contrarian Alex Berenson
- WBUR: Debunking “The Pandemic’s Wrongest Man”
- Nature: Effect of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19
- JAMA: Excess Deaths During COVID-19